<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Twilight Report</title>
    <link>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight</link>
    <description>The Twilight Report - WhiteDactyl.com</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:48:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>NX</generator>
    
      <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090217.1851</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <title>vr</title>
        <link>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090217.1851</link>
        <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/media/090217/?image=dsc_0118.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/media/090217/dsc_0118.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; ALT=&quot;[photograph]&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;mum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This photo was taken with my Nikkor 18-35mm f/2.8 on my D60.  The 
lens doesn't have image stabilisation (IS in Canon lingo and VR in Nikon 
lingo).  It's a wide angle zoom, and it's fast so you usually don't have 
to worry about hand holding the camera in low light (camera shake is 
more of a problem with telephotos and less of a problem with wide 
angle).  It was taken at 17mm f/2.8 at 1/10 of a second.  At 17mm it's 
the same view you'd get on a film camera as about 25mm, so the 
traditional rule of thumb is that you should shoot it at at least 1/30 of 
a second (one over focal length).&lt;/p&gt;

(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090217.1851#cut1&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;)
</description>
        <comments>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090217.1851</comments>
      </item>
      <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090215.1630</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <title>d60</title>
        <link>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090215.1630</link>
        <description>&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/media/090215/?image=dsc_0015.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/media/090215/dsc_0015.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; ALT=&quot;[photograph]&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

&lt;p&gt;D60.  Good:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Lightest DSLR that I've ever used.  I'd much rather take this up Breakneck Ridge than my D700.  It's just 100g heavier than my (film) Minolta Maxxum 4 and 5, and just as compact.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Auto focus is quite good.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Manual focus is easy, for a viewfinder of this size with my vision.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Takes good pictures.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bad:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;

&lt;li&gt;No depth of view preview!&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;There aren't very many knobs and you are forced to go into the menus, which is okay for occasional use, but not if you want to set something in a hurry because you are going to miss a photo.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;No manual focus switch on the body!  I think most (all?) of the AF lenses that work with this camera have a manual focus switch on them, so that is okay (actually prefer the switch on the lens after having gotten used to it with the Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8).&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;AF doesn't work on many older AF lenses, including (as I suspected) my Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3.  As mentioned before the manual focus is excellent, so this isn't as bad as I thought it would be.  I ordered a Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 which will AF on the D60 and will be better for this camera anyway since it is designed for digital cameras with the small sensors.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Metering doesn't work at all with manual focus lenses, which makes them almost useless with this camera.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The bad list looks long, but really most of the bad points are because it would 
be impossible to build such a compact camera with all of those features.  Those things
are what the D700 (or D300) is for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 DX VR.  Good:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;

&lt;li&gt;VR.  The kit lens compensates for camera shake at moderately long shutter speeds.  So far seems to give the in camera image stabilisation of my Minolta Maxxum 7d a run for its money. &lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Actually works pretty well on my D700.  No vignetting at all from 24-55mm, and what you loose from 18-24mm is much less than what gets cropped when you put the camera in DX mode.  I suspect that the optical performance of the glass outside the DX crop may not be up to spec though.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bad:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;

&lt;li&gt;The front of the lens rotates when focusing.  This makes use of a 
polarizer very difficult.  This is common with budget lenses. &lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Tad longer than I was hoping.  The optically far inferior Minolta 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 (without image stabilisation) that came with my Maxxum 5 was more compact. I will be happier when the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX comes out next month.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090215.1630#cut1&quot;&gt;one more example&lt;/a&gt;)
</description>
        <comments>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20090215.1630</comments>
      </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


