<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Twilight Report</title>
    <link>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight</link>
    <description>The Twilight Report - WhiteDactyl.com</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:17:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>NX</generator>
    
      <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20070114.2154</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <title>snowing sir spawn</title>
        <link>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20070114.2154</link>
        <description>
	
	
	
	


&lt;p&gt;Back in high school my friend &lt;tt&gt;wingated&lt;/tt&gt; and I used to totally snow Sean “Little Man” O’Dork (also known as Sir Spawn the Mediocre) with our computer jargon, which mostly consisted of real terms, but was strung together to be meaningless.  On the Thursday edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Colbert_Report&quot;&gt;the Report&lt;/a&gt;, Colbert had an amusing rant on the new Apple &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/iPhone&quot;&gt;iPhone&lt;/a&gt;, which reminded me of those days:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Computers aren’t supposed to be easier or cute.  They’re supposed to be intimidating punch card reading hulks of metal that take up an entire refrigerated room and force you to manually implement recursive procedures and abstract data types in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FORTRAN_77&quot;&gt;FORTRAN 77&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Colbert&quot;&gt;Stephen Colbert&lt;/a&gt; 1/11/07&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m clearly a computer dork though, because while I enjoyed the “uphills both ways in the snow” nature of this rant, my first thought was &lt;i&gt;but you can’t do recursion in FORTRAN 77&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

	
	

</description>
        <comments>http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20070114.2154</comments>
      </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


