<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight</id>
  <title>The Twilight Report</title>
  <subtitle>Your Home For Snappy Repartee</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>應龍</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight" />
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" />
  <updated></updated>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" title="The Twilight Report" />
    <entry>
      <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight:20060805.2054</id>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20060805.2054" />
      <issued>2006-08-06T00:54:00</issued>
      <title>應龍</title>
      <published>2006-08-06T00:54:00</published>
      <updated>2006-08-06T00:54:00</updated>
      <content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Work has been keeping me pretty busy, and while I still find the regime in control of the network at Company 2 to be on the oppressive side, I am enjoying playing with foreign language input methods.  I have been tasked with making software tools usable by native Chinese speakers.  I have always been interested in how people interact with computers and technology, and when you take away all of the assumptions (which I have always lived with) which come along with English, things become a little more interesting.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;b&gt;(&lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20060805.2054#cutid1&quot;&gt;中文 stuff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;b&gt;)&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;P&gt;My knowledge of Chinese is itty-bitty, but just the fact that I can sort of distinguish different forms of Chinese from each other and from other Asian languages excites me.  Maybe someday I will find the time to properly study Chinese.  I think it would be a fun and useful thing to know.  I almost picked up a Chinese language Sydney paper at the newsagent last night just to study the characters.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Last night I went back to Sydney Uni for &quot;Trivia Night.&quot;  It was pretty fun, we had pizza and answered trivial questions.  The one question I got &quot;wrong&quot; was something that I really should have gotten right.  The correct answer was either &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGML&quot;&gt;SGML&lt;/A&gt; or &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML&quot;&gt;HTML&lt;/A&gt;, but I was pretty sure that HTML didn't exist in the 1980s (as specified in the question), where as I knew that SGML (on which HTML is based) had been around since the 80s.  I just checked on Wikipedia, and sure enough the first specification documents for HTML date back to 1993.  The reason I should have known that the &quot;right&quot; answer was HTML is because non-IT people with whom I was playing would be more likely to recognize the term HTML than SGML.  I mean, SGML - what's that?&lt;/P&gt;</content>
    </entry>
</feed>
    


