<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight</id>
  <title>The Twilight Report</title>
  <subtitle>Your Home For Snappy Repartee</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>應龍</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight" />
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" />
  <updated></updated>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" title="The Twilight Report" />
    <entry>
      <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight:20110414.1940</id>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20110414.1940" />
      <issued>2011-04-14T23:40:00</issued>
      <title>overheard</title>
      <published>2011-04-14T23:40:00</published>
      <updated>2011-04-14T23:40:00</updated>
      <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Today I overheard Richmond Guy asking one of my fellow devs if we could 
start using a Restful API, since it is all the range now (is it?), and also
proudly announced that he was using reusable grocery bags (on a related note,
the company is going green so we have to throw out all of those styrofoam 
cups).  The vibe that I
get from Richmond Guy is that he does things because they look like the 
right thing to do and they will help the stock price when and if we become
a public company.  This is not always an &lt;i&gt;entirely&lt;/i&gt; bad motivation for doing
something, but I usually think about how easy or hard things will be to 
maintain in the future and things like system performance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My favourite overheard thing today was when PHP Guy compared women and
the &lt;tt&gt;perl&lt;/tt&gt; programming language saying they were the “same”.  PHP Guy,
as I mentioned hates &lt;tt&gt;perl&lt;/tt&gt; so by the transitive property PHP Guy is
a misogynist.  Anyone who has ever worked in an organization that is mostly
men will not be surprised by this sort of language, and women do sometimes 
make generalizations about men.  I think it's much healthier to have a more
balanced mixture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I disagree with PHP Guy though, there are many things that I like about 
both &lt;tt&gt;perl&lt;/tt&gt; and women and they are nothing alike.  I was going to insert 
a joke here about &lt;tt&gt;perl&lt;/tt&gt; being easier &lt;i&gt;for me&lt;/i&gt; to understand, and then 
deflect the implicit criticism by pointing out that this is due to my own 
limitations, but I actually interact quite well with women.  In fact I 
would love to see more women in programming, not for gender equity (although 
I am all for that), but because I think it would make a better work
environment.  Work environments with mostly men tend to behave badly, but 
if you throw in even a few women, it tends to moderate the worst behaviors.
On a smaller scale, whenever Lena comes down to Maryland to visit, it alters 
my behavior in a positive way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For now of course, what I think is academic, until my Plan for World 
Domination proceeds a little further.  For now I am tracking the character
flaws of the people around me in case I need to use thing information
in my rise to the top.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
    </entry>
</feed>
    


