<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight</id>
  <title>The Twilight Report</title>
  <subtitle>Your Home For Snappy Repartee</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>應龍</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight" />
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" />
  <updated></updated>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" title="The Twilight Report" />
    <entry>
      <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight:20051202.1509</id>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20051202.1509" />
      <issued>2005-12-02T20:09:00</issued>
      <title>Voting</title>
      <published>2005-12-02T20:09:00</published>
      <updated>2005-12-02T20:09:00</updated>
      <content type="html">This story about voting and the official language of the United States came up
in a conversation recently (I think it was at Action Tuesday).

I've heard this &quot;fact&quot; repeated a number of times.

For example, it appeared in one of the little bits of propaganda they
gave me when I was naturalized as an American.

It was a &quot;did you know that&quot; list of reasons why everyone should vote.

One of the &quot;reasons&quot; to vote is that a proposed law, which would have
made German the official language in the United States, was defeated by a
single vote.

Actually:

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;In 1794 a group of German speakers in Virginia petitioned Congress
to publish federal laws in German as well as English.  The intention was
not to supplant English but simply to &lt;EM&gt;supplement&lt;/EM&gt; it.  A House
committee recommended publishing German translations of the laws, but on
January 13, 1795, &quot;a vote to adjourn and sit again on the recommendation&quot;
(apparently an attempt to keep the measure alive rather than killing it
immediately) failed by a vote of 42-41. Frederick Muhlenberg (1750-1801)
was in fact Speaker of the House at the time, but how he voted is
unknown.  Tradition has it that he stepped down to cast a negative vote,
apparently being the German-speaking equivalent of an Oreo. Not that it
mattered.  The vote was merely procedural; its success would have not
guaranteed passage of the measure, and in any case German translations
of federal statutes are a far cry from making German the official
language of the U.S. A similar measure came up a month later and was
also voted down, as were subsequent attempts in later years.

&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;

&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Adams&quot;&gt;Cecil Adams&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

In addition to being factually incorrect the above &quot;reason to vote&quot; is
misleading because it is usually worded to imply that the one vote that
made a difference was made in a referendum, rather than in a vote among
representatives.

I actually think that everyone should vote, and if you don't (and
assuming you have the legal right to do so) you've no cause to complain
about the train wreck which is our government.  Therefore voting is
really about guaranteeing my right to complain, not to actually make a
difference.</content>
    </entry>
</feed>
    


