<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight</id>
  <title>The Twilight Report</title>
  <subtitle>Your Home For Snappy Repartee</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>應龍</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight" />
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" />
  <updated></updated>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/atom" title="The Twilight Report" />
    <entry>
      <id>urn:wd:wdlabs.com:atom1:twilight:20080226.2150</id>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wdlabs.com/twilight/entry/20080226.2150" />
      <issued>2008-02-27T02:50:00</issued>
      <title>obvious things</title>
      <published>2008-02-27T02:50:00</published>
      <updated>2008-02-27T02:50:00</updated>
      <content type="html">&lt;p&gt; Something which should have been obvious occurred to me for the first time today, which is this: developers always get the shit hardware.  End users get the good stuff.  While I can’t think of a business reason why this shouldn’t be the case, it seems unfair to me on account of my being a developer.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    </entry>
</feed>
    


